Rob Hoban's Discussions (681)

View

Discussions Replied To (677)	Replies	Latest Activity
"I still don't agree but it is what the economics for NASCAR demands to keep big spon…" Rob Hoban replied Feb 1, 2012 to RGM back in the Top 35? UPDATE: 2/9/12 NOPE!	119	Feb 12, 2012 Reply by terry s bird
"Best post race comment ever. I'll bet Peterchecker never saw the Highlander movie. …" Rob Hoban replied Jan 13, 2012 to 2012 Dakar Stage 12 Quotes	66	Jan 14, 2012 Reply by terry s bird
"We all realize that Robby's day is done but has anyone else noticed that only 23 of…" Rob Hoban replied Jan 13, 2012 to Jan 13th, 2012 Dakar Rally Stage 12 Race Info & Discussion	244	Feb 25, 2012 Reply by Dusty B
"WE WANT DUNES! WE WANT DUNES! LOVE THE DUNES!!!!!" Rob Hoban replied Jan 13, 2012 to Jan 13th, 2012 Dakar Rally Stage 12 Race Info & Discussion	244	Feb 25, 2012 Reply by Dusty B
"50km of flat sand in the early portion of the stage. What is the expectation for Rob…" Rob Hoban replied Jan 13, 2012 to Jan 13th, 2012 Dakar Rally Stage 12 Race Info & Discussion	244	Feb 25, 2012 Reply by Dusty B
"It's all about stage wins now. Don't worry about everyone else. Pressure is off now,…" Rob Hoban replied Jan 12, 2012 to 2012 Dakar Stage 11 Quotes	79	Jan 13, 2012 Reply by 7gason7
"This happend AGAIN today?!" Rob Hoban replied Jan 12, 2012 to Jan 12th, 2012 Dakar Rally Stage 11 Race Info & Discussion	183	Jan 13, 2012 Reply by Pat Martin
"What happened? Down more than 6 minutes as of WP4. That's more than 8 minutes lost." Rob Hoban replied Jan 12, 2012 to Jan 12th, 2012 Dakar Rally Stage 11 Race Info & Discussion	183	Jan 13, 2012 Reply by Pat Martin
"And I thought it was a bad thing that I couldn't access the chat at work." Rob Hoban replied Jan 12, 2012 to Jan 12th, 2012 Dakar Rally Stage 11 Race Info & Discussion	183	Jan 13, 2012 Reply by Pat Martin
"So far so good. Keep it in Qualifying mode. Robby started 6 minutes behind Petergret…" Rob Hoban replied Jan 12, 2012 to Jan 12th, 2012 Dakar Rally Stage 11 Race Info & Discussion	183	Jan 13, 2012 Reply by Pat Martin