Brett Crawford's Discussions (326)

View

Discussions Replied To (318)	Replies	Latest Activity
"#66, #64, #97 Worst chase driver? Could be anyone here but I'll choose Kenseth." Brett Crawford replied Oct 26, 2010 to KNOCK OUT QUALIFYING CHALLENGE TALLADEGA (FALL)	30	Oct 30, 2010 Reply by Justin Kleiber
"You also have to start in the back, but they're already there." Brett Crawford replied Oct 23, 2010 to RG Driving the 7 in Martinsville?	8	Oct 24, 2010 Reply by ROBERT SAVAGE
"Not many cars are really falling out anymore (SS tracks excluded). If someone runs a…" Brett Crawford replied Oct 22, 2010 to 2010 Martinsville Tums 500 Race Weekend Info & Discussion	268	Oct 25, 2010 Reply by Mike Taylor
"How did Kahne get the #4? I thought a team leased a number for a year (then had 1st…" Brett Crawford replied Oct 21, 2010 to Kahne out at RPM	88	Oct 29, 2010 Reply by R. ALDRIDGE
"It is, or is that sarcasm? I'm surprised this announcement made it to Wednesday afte…" Brett Crawford replied Oct 20, 2010 to Kahne out at RPM	88	Oct 29, 2010 Reply by R. ALDRIDGE
"x2. Wasn't Sorenson already not running the #83 this weekend? Not sure who was suppo…" Brett Crawford replied Oct 20, 2010 to Kahne out at RPM	88	Oct 29, 2010 Reply by R. ALDRIDGE
"No TOG they shouldn't, and I never said they should. I'll toe the company line, so "…" Brett Crawford replied Oct 18, 2010 to Top 35 Bubble Showdown (Wed - New Updates)	39	Oct 21, 2010 Reply by Bigzoom
"Of those three teams, I don't have a ton of confidence for either RGM or the #71 if…" Brett Crawford replied Oct 18, 2010 to Top 35 Bubble Showdown (Wed - New Updates)	39	Oct 21, 2010 Reply by Bigzoom
"I'd venture to say Conway could actually be an asset at Martinsville with them being…" Brett Crawford replied Oct 17, 2010 to OWNER's POINTS AFTER CHARLOTTE (FALL)	83	Oct 20, 2010 Reply by GrayAntiMatter
"Car may be fine, but its slow. I still think there's something wrong in the constru…" Brett Crawford replied Oct 15, 2010 to 2010 Charlotte 500 Race Weekend Info & Discussion	272	Oct 18, 2010 Reply by robert